endothelial growth factor vegf concentration (Boster Bio)
Structured Review

Endothelial Growth Factor Vegf Concentration, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 203 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/endothelial+growth+factor+vegf+concentration/pmc07106818-121-2-15?v=Boster+Bio
Average 95 stars, based on 203 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "PTEN inhibitor VO-OHpic attenuates GC-associated endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction and osteonecrosis of the femoral head via activating Nrf2 signaling and inhibiting mitochondrial apoptosis pathway"
Article Title: PTEN inhibitor VO-OHpic attenuates GC-associated endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction and osteonecrosis of the femoral head via activating Nrf2 signaling and inhibiting mitochondrial apoptosis pathway
Journal: Stem Cell Research & Therapy
doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01658-y
Figure Legend Snippet: VO-OHpic exerts protective effects on MPS-regulated angiogenesis of EPCs. a Representative images of tube formation of EPCs after treatment with 50-μM MPS or 50-μM MPS combined with 1-μM VO-OHpic for 48 h. b VEGF protein concentration in the culture medium of EPCs as determined by ELISA after treatment for 48 h. c Wound healing assay was performed and representative images were taken after 12 h and 24 h in EPCs treated with 50-μM MPS or 50-μM MPS combined with 1-μM VO-OHpic. d The wound closure rate was measured and relatively compared to the control group with no treatment of MPS and VO-OHpic. e VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 protein levels were determined by western blot analysis after treatment for 48 h. f Band density ratios of VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 to GAPDH in the western blot analysis were quantified by densitometry. All experiments were repeated for three times; ∗ P < 0.05 versus control, # P < 0.05 versus 50-μM MPS group. Error bar represents SD
Techniques Used: Protein Concentration, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Wound Healing Assay, Control, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Nrf2 activation is required for VO-OHpic-mediated anti-MPS effects in EPCs. a Relative mRNA expressions of Nrf2 as determined by RT-qPCR 2 days after siNrf2 transfection. b EPCs transfected with or without siNrf2 for 24 h were then treated with 50-μM MPS or 50-μM MPS combined with 1-μM VO-OHpic for 48 h. Nrf2, NQO-1, HO-1, and Trx protein levels were determined by western blot analysis. c Band density ratios of Nrf2, NQO-1, HO-1, and Trx to GAPDH in the western blots were quantified by densitometry. d The cleaved caspase 3 protein level was also determined by western blot analysis. e Band density ratios of cleaved caspase 3 to GAPDH in the western blots were quantified by densitometry. f Flow cytometric analysis of EPCs transfected with or without siNrf2 were stained with Annexin V-FITC/PI after treatment with 50-μM MPS or 50-μM MPS combined with 1-μM VO-OHpic for 48 h. g Percentage of apoptosis rates was expressed as means ± SD. h The VEGF protein level was determined by western blot analysis. i Band density ratios of VEGF to GAPDH in the western blots were quantified by densitometry. j Representative images of tube formation of EPCs in 12 h. EPCs were pre-transfected with and without siNrf2 for 24 h and then treated with 50-μM MPS combined with 1-μM VO-OHpic before seeded into Matrigel. k Representative images of EPCs transfected with or without siNrf2 with intracellular ROS stained by the fluorescence probe DCFH-DA after treatment for 48 h. l Flow cytometric analysis of ROS production after staining with DCFH-DA. m Bar graphs showing the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of ROS levels in EPCs. Data are shown as means ± SD. All experiments were repeated for three times; ∗ P < 0.05 versus EPCs without siNrf2 transfection. Error bar represents SD
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection, Western Blot, Staining, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining of the sections of representative rat femoral heads. a Representative images of CD31 staining in the control, MPS, and MPS + VO-OHpic groups. b Relative CD31 expression was measured with the ImageJ software. ∗ P < 0.05 versus control, # P < 0.05 versus MPS group. Error bar represents SD. c Representative images of VEGF staining in the control, MPS, and MPS + VO-OHpic groups. d Relative VEGF expression was measured with the ImageJ software. ∗ P < 0.05 versus control, # P < 0.05 versus MPS group. Error bar represents SD. e Representative images of VEGFR2 staining in the control, MPS, and MPS + VO-OHpic groups. f Relative VEGFR2 expression was measured with the ImageJ software. g CD31-positive blood vessel number per field under × 200 magnification. h VEGFR2-positive blood vessel number per field under × 200 magnification. ∗ P < 0.05 versus control, # P < 0.05 versus MPS group. Error bar represents SD. Each group consisted of 10 rats/20 femoral heads ( N = 20)
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Control, Expressing, Software
